Accuracy
Corrections
Every publisher gets things wrong. What separates them is whether you can tell, and whether anything happens when you point it out.
How to report an error
Email contact@magoomediagroup.com with three things: which page, what is wrong, and how you know. The third one matters most -- a link to a manufacturer spec sheet or a standard settles it immediately, whereas "this seems wrong" takes a lot longer to act on.
You do not need to be polite about it and you do not need to explain who you are. It goes to Ryder M. directly. There is no form to fill in beyond the contact page if you prefer one.
What happens next
It gets read by a person
Not triaged by a system. Expect an acknowledgement within a couple of working days, including if the answer turns out to be that the page was right.
The claim gets checked against a primary source
Manufacturer documentation, a standards body, a regulator. Not another review site, and not a search result summary.
The page is fixed, on the page
Corrections are made to the live page rather than logged somewhere nobody reads. The wrong version does not stay up while a fix is scheduled.
Material changes carry a visible note
If a correction changes a recommendation, a score or a factual claim, the page says what changed and when, in the body of the page. Typos are fixed silently; substance is not.
It is added to the log below
Material corrections are recorded here permanently, so the record cannot be quietly pruned later.
What counts as a correction
A factual error, a specification that does not match the manufacturer's own documentation, a safety rating cited against the wrong standard, a price or running cost that is no longer accurate, a broken claim about how a product was obtained or tested, or a missing disclosure. All of those get fixed and logged.
Disagreeing with a verdict is not a correction, and neither is being a manufacturer who would prefer a different ranking. Those get a reply, and if the reasoning is good the page changes -- but on the merits, not on request. What a brand cannot do is have a verdict altered because they asked, which is set out in the editorial policy.
The log
No corrections have been issued. That is not a boast -- it is arithmetic. The portfolio has barely started publishing: 1 of the 25 sites is live and the other 24 are still in build, so there is very little in print that could be wrong yet. This page exists now so the process is in place before the first mistake, rather than being written in a hurry after it.
When this log has entries in it, that will be a better sign than an empty one.
The standards this process enforces are on the about page, the testing method behind them is set out category by category, and the portfolio lists every site this applies to.
Found something wrong?
Send the page, the problem and how you know. It reaches one person and it gets fixed on the page.